Lung Cancer Screening Rates are Still Too Low—The CIZ1B Biomarker Blood Test Could Help Save Thousands More Lives

Doctor reviewing a lung X ray with an older patient during a consultation about early lung cancer detection and screening options.

Lung cancer remains the deadliest cancer in America and globally. Yet new research shows that tens of thousands of lives could be saved each year if more people were screened—and if screening guidelines were expanded to reach those at risk who are falling through the cracks.

Today, fewer than 1 in 5 eligible adults receive lung cancer screening. And when screening doesn’t happen, lung cancer is often found late, when treatment is harder, more expensive, and less effective.

Two new national studies published in JAMA and JAMA Network Open show how large this missed opportunity is—and why it’s time to rethink how we screen for lung cancer. They also underscore how more accessible options, including low-cost, minimally invasive biomarker blood tests like CIZ1B, could remove major barriers that keep people from getting screened.

Only 18.7% of People Get Screened for Lung Cancer

Researchers analyzing lung cancer screening data in a laboratory, reviewing medical reports and statistics related to low screening rates in the United States.

Researchers from the American Cancer Society analyzed data and found:

  • Only 18.7% of eligible adults are up to date on lung cancer screening

  • Current screening rates prevent just 24% of potential lung cancer deaths

  • With full uptake, screening could prevent 62,110 deaths over five years—more than four times the current impact

If everyone who qualifies got screened, more than 60,000 additional lives could be saved by 2030.

The study also showed that states vary widely—some with screening rates as low as 9%, other no higher than 31%. This gap leaves thousands of patients undiagnosed until symptoms appear, often when the disease is advanced and has spread to other parts of the body.

Screening Guidelines Miss Most Lung Cancer Cases

A second study from Northwestern University examined nearly 1,000 lung cancer patients and found that current U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) criteria capture only a fraction of real-world cases.

Key findings include:

  • Only 35.1% of lung cancer patients met current screening criteria

  • Universal age-based screening (age 40-85) would detect 93.9% of cancers

  • Expanding older guidelines would still miss almost 40% of cancers

  • Many left out of current criteria are women; Asian and other minority groups; and never-smokers who still developed slung cancer

  • At least 26,124 deaths could be prevented annually under an age-based model

The study clearly shows—tobacco-based criteria miss too many people who go on to develop lung cancer. Lung cancer is no longer only a “smoker’s disease,” and our screening must reflect this.

Why Screening Rates are Low

Patient discussing lung cancer screening concerns with a doctor, highlighting common barriers such as fear, confusion, and limited access to screening.

Low-dose CT (LDCT) scans—the current standard for screening—save lives. But many patients avoid screening because:

  • They are worried about radiation exposure

  • They lack easy access to imaging centers

  • The eligibility rules are confusing

  • They don’t think they qualify

  • They feel healthy and put off screening

  • The tests require scheduling, travel, and time off work

How a Simple Blood Test Like CIZ1B Could Expand Early Detection

Gloved hand holding a blood sample tube used for biomarker testing, representing how a simple blood draw can support early lung cancer detection with the CIZ1B test.

When the screening process is complex, people are far less likely to participate—and cancers go undetected until symptoms appear.

A biomarker blood test such as CIZ1B offers a more accessible approach to early lung cancer detection. Because it requires only a routine blood draw—less than a tablespoon of blood—CIZ1B can:

  • Expand screening access for people who avoid CT scans or live far from image centers

  • Reach people not covered by current screening guidelines, including light smokers, former smokers, never-smokers, or those with environmental exposures

  • Remove common barriers such as fear of radiation or complicated rules

  • Increase participation rates, helping find more cancers at earlier, more treatable stages

The Research is Clear—Lung Cancer Screening Saves Lives

Doctor reviewing lung cancer screening results with a patient, highlighting how early detection improves outcomes and saves lives.

Both studies show that major gains in survival come from detecting more cancers early. A simple, minimally invasive biomarker blood test such as CIZ1B can bring screening to people who might otherwise never be tested.

With screening rates under 20% and current guidelines missing most diagnoses, tests such as CIZ1B can play a powerful role in reaching more people, expanding screening beyond current criteria, and finding lung cancers at earlier, more treatable stages.

Cizzle Bio is committed to advancing diagnostic solutions that make early detection the global standard of care.

To learn more about our groundbreaking CIZ1B biomarker blood test—coming soon to U.S. healthcare providers—please visit:

www.cizzlebio.com


Cizzle Bio, Inc.

Cizzle Bio, Inc. is a pioneering biotechnology company focused on developing innovative solutions for early lung cancer detection. With a commitment to advancing cancer diagnostics, Cizzle Bio, Inc. collaborates with leading research institutions and healthcare professionals to bring groundbreaking biomarker blood tests to market, aiming to improve patient outcomes and save lives.

https://www.cizzlebio.com
Next
Next

Turning Loss into Action in the Fight Against Stomach Cancer